Scientist Says Female-Only Reproduction Is Only a Few Years Away
Imagine a world without men: Lauren Bacall but no Bogie, Hillary Clinton but no Bill, no Starsky or Hutch.
This isn’t just an unlikely sci-fi scenario. This could be reality , according to Bryan Sykes, an eminent professor of genetics at Oxford University and author of “Adam’s Curse: A Future Without Men.”
“The Y chromosome is deteriorating and will, in my belief, disappear,” Sykes told me. A world-renowned authority on genetic material, Sykes is called upon to investigate DNA evidence from crime scenes. His team of researchers is currently compiling a DNA family tree for our species.
Y Chromosome ‘Fatally Flawed’
The Y chromosome is passed from father to son, it’s what makes babies into boys. Basically the human template is a female: the Y chromosome kicks in a few weeks after conception and makes a boy. “Men are genetically modified women,” explained Sykes. But unlike other chromosomes, the Y chromosome can’t repair itself and will, says Sykes, disappear altogether in about 125,000 years.
“Every generation one percent of men will have a mutation which reduces their fertility by 10 percent,” explained Sykes. Unlike most chromosomes, the Y does not travel through the generation in pairs, so can never repair itself from a mirror. Flaws are never repaired. “So if that goes on for generation after generation,” Sykes argued, “eventually there are no functioning Y chromosomes left.”
So no more men … sparsely populated sports bars, Ferrari would lose the lion’s share of its business, and Hooters would probably go out of business.
It’s a long time, 125,000 years. But we men have a far more immediate problem: sperm counts have fallen by an incredible 20 percent in the past 50 years. Stress? Alcohol? Environmental pollution? Who knows, but it’s deeply concerning for those of us with a vested interest in the survival of the male.
Sykes has received hate mail. “To seem to be saying that men will become extinct, which is what I am saying,” he mused. “I’ve had all kinds of messages from male groups saying, ‘how can you betray your gender?’”
But would the absence of men make the world a better place? There would be far fewer wars without men on the planet, and the U.S. prison population would drop a colossal 97 percent. Road deaths in the U.S. would fall 70 percent. The Olympics would be half as long, which some people might view as a good thing.
Female-Only Reproduction
But surely, flawed Y chromosome or not, bad behavior or not, we are needed for procreation. Women can’t have babies without us … right? I’m afraid, pretty soon they won’t need our sperm, our chromosomes, our anything.
Until now, female-only reproduction has been limited to the plant and animal kingdom. So-called parthenogenesis, observed in the Cape Honey Bee, the Kimono Dragon and the hammerhead shark. In humans: confined to 1950s B movies. But Sykes says the technology for women to procreate without us is just around the corner.
“Within the next few years you will get two women having a child who is the biological child of both of them,” Sykes said. “And entirely normal in every respect, but always female.”
Kamau’s NOTE: I did not post all of this article becuz they started heading into anotha direction with it that I think is on the slick so yu can go to the link and continue.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=4725121&page=2
on August 27th, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Ok so instead of just acknowledging that women have superior chromosomes they have to take it to the lesbian stage huhn? They just can’t take that women are superior genetically, they have to demote her to oh women are going to be lesbians. They only way they can get the genetic material from 2 women is to manipulate it manually. That wont happen even if it were 2 lesbians having sex, there’s no way they can pass on their DNA just by having sex, it would have to be genetically modified by scientists. Despite the errors in this man’s thinking it does make u think though. Are they saying Orhemah will be back like it was in cosmic times? And will it actually take like 120,000 something years to return to that? Or will Orhemah evolve to anotha level? Interesting.
on August 27th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Didn’t read the rest, but
The black woman was creating and created stronger and stronger and stronger ((((”Generations”)))) through a genisis that’s patheogenic explanation= Hapi and Muscular Hapi both woman and together pregnant perfecting more ,unlike the blackman and the black woman of today.Hints:sex act
in that steadily creating perfect beings unions between sistas by multiplying. not saying the brothas dont have their part I’m saying the brothas are the((((piece)))) to the black woman so we went from being women to woman and man=seperate , from ((((BeingLOVE)))) to falling in love=black artists depictions of Usss.
And if Orhemah Keeps tossing in her sleep like she’s doing right now, while it’s quiet en-U.S. , then She’s gonna wake up.
This must be why media community targeting our teens for biracial dating amongst intellectually and visually unappealing whites in regular society, ala-media tips and tricks.Anyway,
It is interesting Ariel, I think we have already evolved in the frequency corresponding on our greater plains to black womans current state and when we get there we’ll be happily surprised. Like we used to be. Thats why it’s esoteric cause we always know the news gonna be good we just neva know how good , like when we say to ourselves I Knew It !!
In the carvings they were not saying I knew it, they were saying WOW.
Back to post again: some of the animals they r talkn bout was all women, did physically turn into males, they tryta always disconnect aspects. cant get the full story like.
on August 29th, 2009 at 2:10 am
125,000 years is not that long in light yrs which is where our mind should be anyway.
on August 30th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
NEWS FLASH!! NEWSFLASH!! NEWSFLASH!!
Black is not a color black is something becoming so evrybody out there who claim to be black because-o-skin color is severely confused,
It is apparent that Black Occurs, in that it is an action verb having sex does not create black people it creates people, It’s up to the Orhemah to Create that which is called actual black people
check the out
black in Action
Nigrify
melanize
melanise
blacken
These are words directly associated with blacks in action. not the actual physics that make it black but the action of the physics,
Check reults dat errbody aredy know conscious people like to jam down our throat and continue runnin wit:
color
colour
discolour
discolor
I know yall know this but check the way you think a the door cause it’s barred in this realm
Check melanise:
“convert” into melanin “or”(infiltrate) with melanin,
make or become black
That is the process in the process.
This here is the result of the color black on the move
Check:
Blacken=nigrify,melanize,melanise
Blacken=charred substance AKA black person goals in become pure while in the physical body would be to search for his or her
C,
atomic number 6,
and carbon
We achieved these through and through and apparently the only thing missing in the special black person’s dna is the physical body
AKA Father, Son , Holy Spirit, You
AKA DNA,= ATCG&U
The fouth leg on the Y chromozone is U and left off Purposely cause the C factor in DNA calls for 100percent too.
We got to quit dismantling her when we research
especially when it come the way we define things.
on September 1st, 2009 at 7:31 pm
The So-called Scientists says pluto is a planet again.
on September 1st, 2009 at 8:17 pm
dscvry chnel says, scientist are aware of equivalency between the outer space’s atmosphere/matter and earth’s but they can’t find the equivalecies of water in outer space except for large space objects like meteors, , astroids and such in a crystalized for,
like hard material thats is water but trapped in rocks.
Also down here on earth in rock from space like the words the make earth craters.
but what is the galactic equivalent ?
on September 3rd, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Could it be the black woman