GALACTIC TECHNOLOGY
Orhemah is more than a book. It's an intense, hands-on
critical study which sets out to demonstrate, once and for
all, that Black woman is God. Secondly, and most
interestingly, we show how the various personas once
thought to be male, like Ausar (Osiris), like Ankhnaten, like
Seti, like "King" Tut, Hapi etc. and each one and all of yor
otha all-time Kemetic favorites either did not exist or they do
but are actually Black women. In the beginning, the Black
woman was.
One of the main secrets having been kept from the Black
woman Deitess is the fact that she alone was the builder, the
maker and the founder of all of cosmic Kemet. Therefore, the
real stolen legacy commenced in the first instance was that
rich and voluminous historicity that was taken from our Black
Queen.
For instance, the so-called Pyramids were not constructed
by 100,000 slave men as published by Herodotus. Granted,
some of yall might say, 'yea, we know that.' Cool. But did yu
know too that the Temples, each one and all of them, were
in honor of Black women and not one was built for a single
Black male? Obviously we've been led to believe othawise
by white, black and Arab scholars who either knowingly or
unknowingly hold their allegiance to the religion of
patriarchy, male saviors and male soul-deliverers.
Why we not concentrating on the social dynamic that
preceded the current domination of Kemet by the male
principle?
Yu don't start analyzing yor precious history within the
context of the slave ships, kidnappings and chains do yu?
Yu do not believe that our legacy was born from the
narratives of Kunta Kenta do yu? Well, then, why do we
analyze cosmic Kemet within the context of the male being,
the so-called male pharaohs especially when the abundance
of evidence demonstrates he has not always been in
existence? Oops! I know some of yall ain't ready for that. But
jus the same, our logical resolution should be and remain
consistent.
I'm jus saying, do we really want the truth? Or, do we want
to continue to wallow in the fictional male created aspects of
Kemetic supremacy? One way or the otha, we will
eventually have to come to terms with the fact that much of
what we think we know about cosmic Kemet was given to us
in a processed form.
I know it's a fact that will shock the nervous systems of
many, but not all, especially the Black woman. Most Sistahs
will tell yu that their insticts they knew/know something
wasn't right from the beginning. They will point out the
patriarchal routines whereby Egyptologists almost always
give an analysis, a lecture, a speech within the context of
male domination with the Sistahs, the actual creators, being
on the fringes and peripheries of Kemetic participation as a
glorified "oh, by the way, there was this Queen." The nerve
of us Brothas. The supposed God Re is at the top of the
creation mound, Tehuti is said to be the first male writer.
We've been handed a male Earth God, and Ausar is the
personification of salvation and resurrection. The picture
below is a Sistah sittin on the throne.
Let's talk about Ausar for a few moments. For those of us
who say we deep into the science of Kemet, somehow we
fail to note that Ausar, who did not even exist, was, in the
mythology, resurrected by Auset, the Black woman Deitess.
Yu should ask yorself why this fact is not highlighted. Or, if it
is highlighted, it is so with the intent to articulate how
dedicated the Sistah was to chasing behind the Brotha in
defiance against her own divinity. Some Brothas, even
maybe some Sistahs will try to call this male bashing. But I
respond with this question: How can a man who couldn't
even save himself reach out and all of a sudden become
the savior of us all? Isn't it more logical, even in an esoteric
paradigm, that since the Sistah saved the Brotha that she
alone has the ability to save the souls of the lost people of
Kemet?
One more thing on Ausar. Why do yu suppose that the
early Egyptologist Wallis Budge, who we all quote from one
time or anotha, wrote a whole thick book on Ausar but that
one important fact seems to not escape the lips of us all:
Budge even admits that Ausar did not exist! What's up wit
dat??
Written specifically with the Black woman in mind, and based
on a minimum of 350 various kinds of resources/evidence
including photos, Orhemah takes yu on a long ova due
journey thru yor Temple where yu, the conscious
researcher, understands the complex mechanics of
frequency levels and light-code transmissions. Armed with
this ability, in addition to unconventional mental tools given,
she will unravel the mysteries of cosmic phenomena and
encounter secrets that have been kept from her for well ova
five thousand years.
Orhemah is more than a book. It's an intense, hands-on
critical study which sets out to demonstrate, once and for
all, that Black woman is God. Secondly, and most
interestingly, we show how the various personas once
thought to be male, like Ausar (Osiris), like Ankhnaten, like
Seti, like "King" Tut, Hapi etc. and each one and all of yor
otha all-time Kemetic favorites either did not exist or they do
but are actually Black women. In the beginning, the Black
woman was.
One of the main secrets having been kept from the Black
woman Deitess is the fact that she alone was the builder, the
maker and the founder of all of cosmic Kemet. Therefore, the
real stolen legacy commenced in the first instance was that
rich and voluminous historicity that was taken from our Black
Queen.
For instance, the so-called Pyramids were not constructed
by 100,000 slave men as published by Herodotus. Granted,
some of yall might say, 'yea, we know that.' Cool. But did yu
know too that the Temples, each one and all of them, were
in honor of Black women and not one was built for a single
Black male? Obviously we've been led to believe othawise
by white, black and Arab scholars who either knowingly or
unknowingly hold their allegiance to the religion of
patriarchy, male saviors and male soul-deliverers.
Why we not concentrating on the social dynamic that
preceded the current domination of Kemet by the male
principle?
Yu don't start analyzing yor precious history within the
context of the slave ships, kidnappings and chains do yu?
Yu do not believe that our legacy was born from the
narratives of Kunta Kenta do yu? Well, then, why do we
analyze cosmic Kemet within the context of the male being,
the so-called male pharaohs especially when the abundance
of evidence demonstrates he has not always been in
existence? Oops! I know some of yall ain't ready for that. But
jus the same, our logical resolution should be and remain
consistent.
I'm jus saying, do we really want the truth? Or, do we want
to continue to wallow in the fictional male created aspects of
Kemetic supremacy? One way or the otha, we will
eventually have to come to terms with the fact that much of
what we think we know about cosmic Kemet was given to us
in a processed form.
I know it's a fact that will shock the nervous systems of
many, but not all, especially the Black woman. Most Sistahs
will tell yu that their insticts they knew/know something
wasn't right from the beginning. They will point out the
patriarchal routines whereby Egyptologists almost always
give an analysis, a lecture, a speech within the context of
male domination with the Sistahs, the actual creators, being
on the fringes and peripheries of Kemetic participation as a
glorified "oh, by the way, there was this Queen." The nerve
of us Brothas. The supposed God Re is at the top of the
creation mound, Tehuti is said to be the first male writer.
We've been handed a male Earth God, and Ausar is the
personification of salvation and resurrection. The picture
below is a Sistah sittin on the throne.
Let's talk about Ausar for a few moments. For those of us
who say we deep into the science of Kemet, somehow we
fail to note that Ausar, who did not even exist, was, in the
mythology, resurrected by Auset, the Black woman Deitess.
Yu should ask yorself why this fact is not highlighted. Or, if it
is highlighted, it is so with the intent to articulate how
dedicated the Sistah was to chasing behind the Brotha in
defiance against her own divinity. Some Brothas, even
maybe some Sistahs will try to call this male bashing. But I
respond with this question: How can a man who couldn't
even save himself reach out and all of a sudden become
the savior of us all? Isn't it more logical, even in an esoteric
paradigm, that since the Sistah saved the Brotha that she
alone has the ability to save the souls of the lost people of
Kemet?
One more thing on Ausar. Why do yu suppose that the
early Egyptologist Wallis Budge, who we all quote from one
time or anotha, wrote a whole thick book on Ausar but that
one important fact seems to not escape the lips of us all:
Budge even admits that Ausar did not exist! What's up wit
dat??
Written specifically with the Black woman in mind, and based
on a minimum of 350 various kinds of resources/evidence
including photos, Orhemah takes yu on a long ova due
journey thru yor Temple where yu, the conscious
researcher, understands the complex mechanics of
frequency levels and light-code transmissions. Armed with
this ability, in addition to unconventional mental tools given,
she will unravel the mysteries of cosmic phenomena and
encounter secrets that have been kept from her for well ova
five thousand years.
That makes jus as much sense as
someone tryna convince the
descendants of Alkebu-lan that
their history began during their
global enslavement around the
14th and
15th centuries.
someone tryna convince the
descendants of Alkebu-lan that
their history began during their
global enslavement around the
14th and
15th centuries.
And this is why our beloved
Dr.Ben explained in one of his
powerful lectures that "there is
nothing equal between me and
a [black] woman." Male
bashing is acually allowing a
bunch of untruths to be
attached to his legacy. It's
bashing becuz one day the
truth will emerge and when it
does it will leave the male with
nothing to hold on to as he
was given, and allowed to
bask in, imaginary attributes
with the main intent to deceive
othas and himself and to
consequently subtract the
glory which belongs to Black
women. That is male bashing.
Dr.Ben explained in one of his
powerful lectures that "there is
nothing equal between me and
a [black] woman." Male
bashing is acually allowing a
bunch of untruths to be
attached to his legacy. It's
bashing becuz one day the
truth will emerge and when it
does it will leave the male with
nothing to hold on to as he
was given, and allowed to
bask in, imaginary attributes
with the main intent to deceive
othas and himself and to
consequently subtract the
glory which belongs to Black
women. That is male bashing.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |