GALACTIC TECHNOLOGY
Orhemah is more than a book. It's an intense, hands-on critical
study which sets out to demonstrate, once and for all, that Black
woman is God. Secondly, and most interestingly, we show how the
various personas once thought to be male, like Ausar (Osiris), like
Ankhnaten, like Seti, like "King" Tut, Hapi etc. and each one and
all of yor otha all-time Kemetic favorites either did not exist or they
do but are actually Black women. In the beginning, the Black
woman was.
One of the main secrets having been kept from the Black woman
Deitess is the fact that she alone was the builder, the maker and the
founder of all of cosmic Kemet. Therefore, the real stolen legacy
commenced in the first instance was that rich and voluminous
historicity that was taken from our Black Queen.
For instance, the so-called Pyramids were not constructed by
100,000 slave men as published by Herodotus. Granted, some of
yall might say, 'yea, we know that.' Cool. But did yu know too that
the Temples, each one and all of them, were in honor of Black
women and not one was built for a single Black male? Obviously
we've been led to believe othawise by white, black and Arab scholars
who either knowingly or unknowingly hold their allegiance to the
religion of patriarchy, male saviors and male soul-deliverers.
Why we not concentrating on the social dynamic that preceded the
current domination of Kemet by the male principle?
Yu don't start analyzing yor precious history within the context of
the slave ships, kidnappings and chains do yu? Yu do not believe
that our legacy was born from the narratives of Kunta Kenta do
yu? Well, then, why do we analyze cosmic Kemet within the
context of the male being, the so-called male pharaohs especially
when the abundance of evidence demonstrates he has not always
been in existence? Oops! I know some of yall ain't ready for that.
But jus the same, our logical resolution should be and remain
consistent.
I'm jus saying, do we really want the truth? Or, do we want to
continue to wallow in the fictional male created aspects of Kemetic
supremacy? One way or the otha, we will eventually have to come
to terms with the fact that much of what we think we know about
cosmic Kemet was given to us in a processed form.
I know it's a fact that will shock the nervous systems of many, but
not all, especially the Black woman. Most Sistahs will tell yu that
their insticts they knew/know something wasn't right from the
beginning. They will point out the patriarchal routines whereby
Egyptologists almost always give an analysis, a lecture, a speech
within the context of male domination with the Sistahs, the actual
creators, being on the fringes and peripheries of Kemetic
participation as a glorified "oh, by the way, there was this Queen."
The nerve of us Brothas. The supposed God Re is at the top of
the creation mound, Tehuti is said to be the first male writer.
We've been handed a male Earth God, and Ausar is the
personification of salvation and resurrection. The picture below is a
Sistah sittin on the throne.
Let's talk about Ausar for a few moments. For those of us who say
we deep into the science of Kemet, somehow we fail to note that
Ausar, who did not even exist, was, in the mythology, resurrected by
Auset, the Black woman Deitess. Yu should ask yorself why this
fact is not highlighted. Or, if it is highlighted, it is so with the intent
to articulate how dedicated the Sistah was to chasing behind the
Brotha in defiance against her own divinity. Some Brothas, even
maybe some Sistahs will try to call this male bashing. But I
respond with this question: How can a man who couldn't even
save himself reach out and all of a sudden become the savior of us
all? Isn't it more logical, even in an esoteric paradigm, that since the
Sistah saved the Brotha that she alone has the ability to save the
souls of the lost people of Kemet?
One more thing on Ausar. Why do yu suppose that the early
Egyptologist Wallis Budge, who we all quote from one time or
anotha, wrote a whole thick book on Ausar but that one
important fact seems to not escape the lips of us all: Budge even
admits that Ausar did not exist! What's up wit dat??
Written specifically with the Black woman in mind, and based on a
minimum of 350 various kinds of resources/evidence including
photos, Orhemah takes yu on a long ova due journey thru yor
Temple where yu, the conscious researcher, understands the
complex mechanics of frequency levels and light-code transmissions.
Armed with this ability, in addition to unconventional mental tools
given, she will unravel the mysteries of cosmic phenomena and
encounter secrets that have been kept from her for well ova five
thousand years.
Orhemah is more than a book. It's an intense, hands-on critical
study which sets out to demonstrate, once and for all, that Black
woman is God. Secondly, and most interestingly, we show how the
various personas once thought to be male, like Ausar (Osiris), like
Ankhnaten, like Seti, like "King" Tut, Hapi etc. and each one and
all of yor otha all-time Kemetic favorites either did not exist or they
do but are actually Black women. In the beginning, the Black
woman was.
One of the main secrets having been kept from the Black woman
Deitess is the fact that she alone was the builder, the maker and the
founder of all of cosmic Kemet. Therefore, the real stolen legacy
commenced in the first instance was that rich and voluminous
historicity that was taken from our Black Queen.
For instance, the so-called Pyramids were not constructed by
100,000 slave men as published by Herodotus. Granted, some of
yall might say, 'yea, we know that.' Cool. But did yu know too that
the Temples, each one and all of them, were in honor of Black
women and not one was built for a single Black male? Obviously
we've been led to believe othawise by white, black and Arab scholars
who either knowingly or unknowingly hold their allegiance to the
religion of patriarchy, male saviors and male soul-deliverers.
Why we not concentrating on the social dynamic that preceded the
current domination of Kemet by the male principle?
Yu don't start analyzing yor precious history within the context of
the slave ships, kidnappings and chains do yu? Yu do not believe
that our legacy was born from the narratives of Kunta Kenta do
yu? Well, then, why do we analyze cosmic Kemet within the
context of the male being, the so-called male pharaohs especially
when the abundance of evidence demonstrates he has not always
been in existence? Oops! I know some of yall ain't ready for that.
But jus the same, our logical resolution should be and remain
consistent.
I'm jus saying, do we really want the truth? Or, do we want to
continue to wallow in the fictional male created aspects of Kemetic
supremacy? One way or the otha, we will eventually have to come
to terms with the fact that much of what we think we know about
cosmic Kemet was given to us in a processed form.
I know it's a fact that will shock the nervous systems of many, but
not all, especially the Black woman. Most Sistahs will tell yu that
their insticts they knew/know something wasn't right from the
beginning. They will point out the patriarchal routines whereby
Egyptologists almost always give an analysis, a lecture, a speech
within the context of male domination with the Sistahs, the actual
creators, being on the fringes and peripheries of Kemetic
participation as a glorified "oh, by the way, there was this Queen."
The nerve of us Brothas. The supposed God Re is at the top of
the creation mound, Tehuti is said to be the first male writer.
We've been handed a male Earth God, and Ausar is the
personification of salvation and resurrection. The picture below is a
Sistah sittin on the throne.
Let's talk about Ausar for a few moments. For those of us who say
we deep into the science of Kemet, somehow we fail to note that
Ausar, who did not even exist, was, in the mythology, resurrected by
Auset, the Black woman Deitess. Yu should ask yorself why this
fact is not highlighted. Or, if it is highlighted, it is so with the intent
to articulate how dedicated the Sistah was to chasing behind the
Brotha in defiance against her own divinity. Some Brothas, even
maybe some Sistahs will try to call this male bashing. But I
respond with this question: How can a man who couldn't even
save himself reach out and all of a sudden become the savior of us
all? Isn't it more logical, even in an esoteric paradigm, that since the
Sistah saved the Brotha that she alone has the ability to save the
souls of the lost people of Kemet?
One more thing on Ausar. Why do yu suppose that the early
Egyptologist Wallis Budge, who we all quote from one time or
anotha, wrote a whole thick book on Ausar but that one
important fact seems to not escape the lips of us all: Budge even
admits that Ausar did not exist! What's up wit dat??
Written specifically with the Black woman in mind, and based on a
minimum of 350 various kinds of resources/evidence including
photos, Orhemah takes yu on a long ova due journey thru yor
Temple where yu, the conscious researcher, understands the
complex mechanics of frequency levels and light-code transmissions.
Armed with this ability, in addition to unconventional mental tools
given, she will unravel the mysteries of cosmic phenomena and
encounter secrets that have been kept from her for well ova five
thousand years.
That makes jus as much sense as
someone tryna convince the
descendants of Alkebu-lan that their
history began during their global
enslavement around the 14th and
15th centuries.
someone tryna convince the
descendants of Alkebu-lan that their
history began during their global
enslavement around the 14th and
15th centuries.
And this is why our beloved
Dr.Ben explained in one of his
powerful lectures that "there is
nothing equal between me and a
[black] woman." Male bashing is
acually allowing a bunch of
untruths to be attached to his
legacy. It's bashing becuz one day
the truth will emerge and when it
does it will leave the male with
nothing to hold on to as he was
given, and allowed to bask in,
imaginary attributes with the main
intent to deceive othas and
himself and to consequently
subtract the glory which belongs to
Black women. That is male
bashing.
Dr.Ben explained in one of his
powerful lectures that "there is
nothing equal between me and a
[black] woman." Male bashing is
acually allowing a bunch of
untruths to be attached to his
legacy. It's bashing becuz one day
the truth will emerge and when it
does it will leave the male with
nothing to hold on to as he was
given, and allowed to bask in,
imaginary attributes with the main
intent to deceive othas and
himself and to consequently
subtract the glory which belongs to
Black women. That is male
bashing.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |